Motion Practice, an Avengers AU
Chapter 4: “To See, To Say”
Clint Barton, Tony Stark, Natasha Romanoff, Bruce Banner, Darcy Lewis, Thor Odinson, Bucky Barnes, Wade Wilson, Phil Coulson, Maria Hill, Steve Rogers
Rated PG-13 for language; 9,723 words
Author's Note: In jury selection, a "challenge for cause" is a tool an attorney uses to dismiss a juror for a sound legal reason (i.e., that juror is too biased to decide the case impartially). In most jurisdictions, the challenging attorney must present his reasoning to the court and allow opposing counsel to respond. Attorneys generally have an unlimited number of challenges for cause. A "peremptory challenge", on the other hand, is one in which the attorney does not have to explain his reasoning. These challenges are usually limited in number and, as long as the attorney isn't doing something improper with them (i.e. using them to eliminate all the women on the panel), the court and opposing counsel do not interfere.
When Clint Barton takes a job prosecuting traffic offenses and DUIs at the Suffolk County District Attorney's office, he's pretty sure his life is finally going in the right direction. But the problem isn't the direction: it's where he ends up.
In this chapter, Clint discovers that sulking is simultaneously productive and lonely, and decides that one of those conditions is unacceptable.
( Chapter 4: To See, To Say )
Previous chapters: Disclaimer | Prologue | Chapter 1 | Chapter 2 | Chapter 3
Chapter 4: “To See, To Say”
Clint Barton, Tony Stark, Natasha Romanoff, Bruce Banner, Darcy Lewis, Thor Odinson, Bucky Barnes, Wade Wilson, Phil Coulson, Maria Hill, Steve Rogers
Rated PG-13 for language; 9,723 words
Author's Note: In jury selection, a "challenge for cause" is a tool an attorney uses to dismiss a juror for a sound legal reason (i.e., that juror is too biased to decide the case impartially). In most jurisdictions, the challenging attorney must present his reasoning to the court and allow opposing counsel to respond. Attorneys generally have an unlimited number of challenges for cause. A "peremptory challenge", on the other hand, is one in which the attorney does not have to explain his reasoning. These challenges are usually limited in number and, as long as the attorney isn't doing something improper with them (i.e. using them to eliminate all the women on the panel), the court and opposing counsel do not interfere.
When Clint Barton takes a job prosecuting traffic offenses and DUIs at the Suffolk County District Attorney's office, he's pretty sure his life is finally going in the right direction. But the problem isn't the direction: it's where he ends up.
In this chapter, Clint discovers that sulking is simultaneously productive and lonely, and decides that one of those conditions is unacceptable.
( Chapter 4: To See, To Say )
Previous chapters: Disclaimer | Prologue | Chapter 1 | Chapter 2 | Chapter 3